ADHD and Neuorfeedback

Recently, a parent asked me the followingfor ADHD as well as a number of other
questionconditions.
I visited your web site and noticed a section calledIt's true that the research does not rule out other
How to Read a Scientific Article. I was quitepossible explanations for the effectiveness of
impressed with this article.neurofeedback in ADHD. Researchers have not
This special report on your web site is vitallyyet proven that the placebo effect is causing the
important for treatment providers and treatmentresults. No one has proven that it is not the extra
seekers. It is important for all of us who valuetherapeutic interaction.
the use of the scientific method in makingHowever, in my opinion, these other explanations
decisions about what kinds of services to seekare not very likely. We do not see any other
and what kinds of services to provide.placebo getting the results that Neurofeedback
What you mention in that article can serve asgets. Nor do we see intense therapeutic attention
reminder to what many of us learned asin other settings delivering such results.
undergraduates and graduate students in scienceTo the best of my knowledge, there has never
based programs. It can serve as a simplified andbeen a study that shows or even suggests that it
easy to remember scientifically based evaluationNeurofeedback does not work. The worst
tool to help sort out the different types ofcomplaint the antagonists can level is that it has
interventions.not yet been proven to work.
Within the context of that special report on yourIt is true that the studies on Neurofeedback have
web site about learning to evaluate and tonot proven that it works. I want to stress,
interpret what is true and expose what is hype,however, that not proven does not mean
how would you rate the evidence presented fordisproved.
Neurofeedback compared to other types ofAlthough in the pure scientific sense there is
interventions?"something lacking from the Neurofeedback
Here is my reply:literature, we are dealing with patients' lives.
I am glad you enjoyed How to Read a ScientificIt is not fair to our patients not to use what is
Article. Please, download it and give it out to yourmost probably a very effective treatment
friends and colleagues.modality just because we would like more elegant
As for your question about Neurofeedback:research. With that in mind we have to evaluate
There are many leading ADHD researchers whoneurofeedback based upon the evidence that is in
come out very strongly against Neurofeedback asfront of us.
a treatment for ADHD. Their main complaintI agree that neurofeedback needs more scientific
against Neurofeedback is that the research is notwork to be proven an effective modality.
well done.However, as a clinician I feel that I have all the
There are numerous studies available, but they allevidence that I need in order to advise patients
have weaknesses. Most studies lack the properto use it.
controls to prove that Neurofeedback works. InI still have a lot of questions about it. It is not
many studies, Neurofeedback was used inreally clear to me how effective it is. What
conjunction with other modalities, so it isn't clearpercentage of patients fail? What percentage
why the children in these studies got better.achieves only partial success? I have heard claims
So scientifically, I would have to conclude thatof success ranging in the 95+%. I don't know
Neurofeedback has not been proven to be anhow accurate these claims really are.
effective treatment for ADHD.I personally don't have enough information to
Thank God, I am a clinician and not a scientist!discern between the effectiveness of different
In my opinion, based upon the evidence that weneurofeedback techniques. I would like to see
have available, Neurofeedback works very wellmore research in these areas.